medtigo Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

|Literature Review

| Volume 1, Issue 1

Methadone and Buprenorphine Use in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mini Review


Author Affiliations

medtigo J Anesth Pain Med. |
Date - Received: Mar 01, 2025,
Accepted: Mar 04, 2025,
Published: Apr 14, 2025.

Abstract

The management of pain and opioid dependence in the intensive care unit (ICU) presents unique challenges, necessitating alternative strategies beyond traditional opioids. Methadone and buprenorphine have emerged as promising options due to their distinct pharmacological profiles. This comprehensive review examines the pharmacology, efficacy, safety profile, and practical considerations of methadone and buprenorphine use in the ICU. Both agents provide analgesia and manage opioid dependence, with favorable safety profiles when used judiciously. However, careful dosing and monitoring are essential, particularly regarding methadone’s QT prolongation risk and buprenorphine’s hepatic metabolism. This review addresses the role of methadone and buprenorphine in ICU patients.

Keywords

Intensive care unit, Critical care, Pain management, Methadone, Buprenorphine, Opioid withdrawal.

Introduction

The introduction of Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in the hospital requires some important considerations. These include dosing and route of initiation, monitoring symptoms, pain control, use of adjunctive supportive medications for withdrawal symptoms, and transition to outpatient therapy.[1] Often, patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are challenging compared to outpatients for management of opioid use disorder (OUD) due to multiorgan dysfunction, hemodynamic instability, respiratory instability, drug-drug interactions, delirium, constipation, and the inability of ICU patients to communicate pain due to mechanical ventilation, ICU sedation and symptoms of withdrawal. If pain is not adequately managed post-surgery, it can lead to adverse cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes as well as the development of chronic pain syndrome.[2] OUD survey scales, like the clinical opiate withdrawal scale, are not possible in the ICU setting.[1] Medications commonly used for OUD in the ICU include Buprenorphine, Methadone, Buprenorphine/Naloxone, and naltrexone.[3] Challenges after MOUD initiation in the ICU setting include the outpatient establishment of treatment programs for the continuation of treatment and strategies to reduce the return to opioid use after discharge. Due to the increasing incidence of opioid use, clinicians encounter more OUD patients in the ICU. It is, therefore, necessary for ICU physicians to understand the score of buprenorphine and methadone in the ICU and the management of patients admitted with OUD.

In a study by Casamento et al. on opioid-naïve patients who were mechanically ventilated and received fentanyl or morphine for sedation in the ANALGESIC trial, one in seven patients received opioid medications at hospital discharge.[4] Patients with surgical reasons for admission or chronic comorbidities were at a higher risk of being prescribed opioids. Three patients for every 100 ICU discharge opioid prescriptions continued to use opioids for 6 months and 1 year following discharge. Several studies present similar rates of opioid use after ICU discharge, ranging from 15 -76%, and persistent use, ranging from 2.6 – 19%. Often, surgical ICU units and longer hospital stays were risk factors for persistent opioid use on discharge.[5-9] With the rising opioid epidemic, it is necessary to find alternative medications for pain control in the ICU. Further medications such as fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone that are used in the ICU rapidly induce tolerance. These medications can cause hyperalgesia and chronic pain syndrome due to increased sensitivity to pain.

Hsiang Ma et al., in their systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, found that systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduced 24-hour opioid consumption and reduced pain scores.[10] Therefore, it is imperative to find alternative medications for pain control in the ICU to decrease long-term opioid use, further in a large database analysis on cardiopulmonary resuscitation or arrest (CPRA). Patients on opioids and sedatives had a 3.47 odds ratio for CPRA. Fifty-four percent of these patients were in the intensive care unit. This further necessitates finding alternatives for opioid-sparing pain medications and sedatives in the ICU.[11] Resources for the management of opioid use disorders in the ICU are limited, and ICU teams often lack information on the sedation needs of patients with OUD, knowledge of the continuation of medications such as methadone in the ICU, and guidelines to manage opioid withdrawal.[12]

Methadone: Pharmacology and dosing
Methadone is a synthetic opioid medication that is used primarily in the treatment of opioid dependence. It also has numerous roles in being an effective analgesic agent.[13] Methadone is a long-active opioid with a single chiral center that forms an R enantiomer (lev-methadone) and S enantiomer (Dextro-methadone). R-Methadone is a mu-opioid receptor agonist that mimics the body’s natural endogenous opioids, endorphins, and enkephalins. Methadone is also a weak antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which potentiates opioid analgesia and decreases hyperalgesia, opioid tolerance, and chronic pain.[14] Methadone can elevate mood in a percentage of patients by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine in the brain.[15,16]

Changes in the metabolism and elimination of methadone are dependent on the induction or inhibition of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 in the liver. Therefore, medications used in the ICU that affect the metabolism of methadone may need additional dose alteration and monitoring. Methadone is metabolized exclusively by the liver and partially in the small intestine. It has 80% bioavailability when given orally.

Methadone has a biphasic pattern of slow elimination, an α- α-elimination lasting phase 8-12 hours and β- β-elimination phase lasting 30–60 hours.[17] The α-elimination defines the duration of analgesia, and during β-elimination, the methadone levels are sub-analgesic and prevent the development of withdrawal symptoms. Therefore, for analgesic effects, the dosing is 3-4 times/day, whereas for methadone maintenance treatment, it is once a day.[18]

Dosing is dependent on multiple permutations of a patient’s history. In patients requiring methadone for opioid use disorder and patients who are naïve to opioid treatment, the dose should not exceed 7.5 mg of oral methadone daily for pain.[17] It can be started at 2.5mg orally every 8-12 hours and increased every 5-7 days. In patients on opioid doses < 40-60 mg, median cumulative intraoperative opioid consumption morphine milligram equivalent (MME)/day, methadone dose can be started similarly to opioid-naive patients. In patients on higher doses, conversion from morphine to methadone should be done based on the patients’ total MME/day.[19] Patients who have been opioid tolerant prior to admission should receive dosages no greater than 30-40mg per day to prevent withdrawal symptoms if there is no plan for giving an outpatient methadone prescription.[17]

Pain relief with methadone is rapid in onset and starts within 30 minutes and peaks in 2-4 hours after ingestion. Methadone does not require dose alterations in critically ill patients and is not removed by hemodialysis. There is a lack of published data on its safety in patients with acute liver failure; therefore, cautious use is recommended. In patients admitted to the ICU previously on methadone and who cannot take oral formulations, the common conversion is 1:1.3 from parenteral to enteral route based on a scoping review of available literature by Liu et al. or 1 1.2.[20] Clinicians can often start with a conservative dose of 1:1 and increase if required. IV dosing of methadone for surgery and analgesia is given at 0.2 mg/kg or a fixed dose of 20 mg.[21] The elimination half-life can be between 24-36 hours. The effects of methadone can be reversed with naloxone. Monitoring patients while on methadone for respiratory depression, opioid withdrawal symptoms, sedation, and lethargy is needed. NSAIDs and short-acting agents such as morphine can be used for breakthrough pain.[19]

Buprenorphine: Pharmacology and dosing
Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for OUD. It binds to the mu-opioid receptor and produces typical opioid effects. Due to its high-affinity partial agonist effects, buprenorphine can achieve a maximal effect compared to a full mu-opioid receptor agonist.[22] The high affinity for the mu-opioid receptor makes it extremely difficult to displace from its site, which explains its ability to block the subjective and physiologic effects of other opioids.[22]

Sublingual buprenorphine has a half-life of 37 hours. It is metabolized by the CYP3A4 in the liver. For acute pain, IV buprenorphine is initially started at a 0.3mg dose every 6 to 8 hours as needed. Patients who are naïve to receiving the transdermal patch are started with a 5mcg/hour dose applied once every 7 days.[23] In patients who are withdrawing from opioids in the hospital, they are given an intravenous (IV) buprenorphine starting at 0.3mg up to 0.9mg over 20 to 30 minutes every 6 to 12 hours.[24] Buprenorphine dose may require reduction in patients with impaired hepatic function. It is not affected by renal dysfunction. Buprenorphine can also be combined with naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, to prevent adulteration. Table 1 shows the characteristics of methadone and Buprenorphine.

Buprenorphine Methadone
Partial agonist at mu receptors Full agonist at mu receptors
Metabolized by the Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) in the liver Metabolized in liver by Cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) and CYP3A4
The onset of action in 15 minutes and peak action in 1 hour, mean elimination half-life of 2.2 hours for an intravenous dose The onset of action in 30 minutes and peak in 2-4 hours, with a half-life of 24-36 hours or longer
Intravenous dose of 0.3 mg up to 0.9 mg over 20 to 30 minutes every 6 to 12 hours as needed A dose of 2.5 mg daily twice or thrice daily and increased every 5-7 days. Dosing for opioid use disorder based on median cumulative intraoperative opioid consumption (MME)/day
Effects reversed with naloxone

Table 1: Characteristics of methadone and buprenorphine in the ICU

Clinical application of methadone in the ICU
Methadone can be used in the critically ill population for transitioning from IV fentanyl to enteral opioid medications, perioperatively to decrease post-operative opioid consumption, for treatment of true morphine allergy, for treatment of cancer pain, for patients with renal failure, and for dialysis. Azimi et al., in their retrospective study on ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated and on continuous IV fentanyl infusion or hydromorphone for ≥72 hours, found that usage of enteral methadone resulted in faster intravenous opioid weaning compared to using enteral oxycodone.[25]. Srinivasan et al. conducted a study of 42 children who were mechanically ventilated on sedation and analgesia for >5 days.[26] The authors were able to convert using a methadone-to-fentanyl ratio of approximately 2.5:1 over a period of 48 hours. This was associated with fewer withdrawal symptoms and the need for rescue opioids. In a randomized controlled trial on mechanically ventilated ICU patients on fentanyl for >5 days, the authors compared methadone to placebo administration for weaning time and duration of mechanical ventilation. The use of methadone was associated with a shorter weaning time and successful weaning by day five after study inclusion.[27]

Klaire et al. describe rapid methadone up-titration for opioid use disorder in the ICU with a mean dose of 65 mg on day seven.[28] One percent of ninety-eight patients had sedation requiring additional monitoring. Methadone was well tolerated by the patients. Najafi et al. compared fentanyl vs methadone for opioid withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients.[29] Administration of methadone was associated with the alleviation of withdrawal signs and symptoms within 30 minutes compared to 120 minutes with fentanyl. Both drugs were comparable for treating opioid withdrawal symptoms in the ICU.

Wang et al. conducted a retrospective study of a single dose of IV methadone perioperatively for the reduction of postoperative opioid requirements.[29] In his study of 117 patients, the median cumulative intraoperative opioid consumption (MME) was lower by 44% on postoperative day zero in the methadone group. However, the MME did not differ on day one due to the waning effects of methadone. The overall pain scores and respiratory support requirements did not differ between the two groups. In a Randomized controlled trial by Murphy et al. on 156 cardiac surgical patients who received IV methadone (0.3 mg/kg) vs fentanyl (12 μg/kg) intraoperatively.[30] The authors showed a reduction in pain scores for 72 hours post-surgery and morphine requirements compared to patients who received IV fentanyl. Further use of intraoperative methadone also makes weaning opioids after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery easier.[31] The addition of methadone to high-dose opioid treatment can improve pain control. However, it was associated with a risk of sedation and delirium.[32] Bastian et al. describe a single dose of methadone administered perioperatively along with anesthesia to reduce postoperative opioid consumption.[33] The median cumulative morphine consumption was lower in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and for up to 72 hours after surgery. Fentanyl consumption during the surgery did not differ between the two groups.

Clinical application of buprenorphine in the ICU
Research is currently being conducted on the various applications of buprenorphine in pain management in critically ill patients in the ICU. Buprenorphine has been shown to have equivocal efficacy compared to enteral/oral oxycodone. Due to its availability in sublingual formulation, this medication is an appropriate option for ICU patients who cannot take oral/enteral medications. Furthermore, in more critically ill patients, patients who are hypotensive or hypovolemic, adequate pain control was achieved without causing alterations in hemodynamics when using buprenorphine.[34] Buprenorphine can be used in the ICU in patients with a prior history of OUD on buprenorphine outpatient. Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) can be used to monitor conscious patients with opioid withdrawal, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) criteria can be used for patients with impaired consciousness.

In addition, patients who have OUD benefited from having low-dose buprenorphine induction as it led to reduced usage of full agonist opioids in critically ill patients.[35,36] Patients admitted to the critical care unit with prior opioid use benefit from continuing the same opioid dose during hospital admission to prevent withdrawal. Additionally, patients in acute pain need additional pain medication requirements from their baseline of MOUD.

In a retrospective study on critically ill patients with opioid use disorder, patients on buprenorphine prior to hospital admission, continuation of the buprenorphine dose was associated with a decreased use of full opioid agonists.[37] Patanwala et al. conducted a propensity-matched study of 288 ICU patients.[38] He compared sublingual buprenorphine to oral/enteral oxycodone for pain control in patients on full opioid agonists. The authors found no difference in pain control and opioid consumption between the two medications. It is, therefore, an appropriate medication in the ICU for pain control in patients unable to take oral/enteral full opioid agonist medications. Machado et al. performed a systematic review of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) for acute post-operative pain.[39] The review comprised 615 patients and had studies that initiated buprenorphine within 48 hours of surgery and continued use up to 28 days after the procedure. The authors found a decrease in postoperative pain scores, pain medication consumption, and patient satisfaction. The studies evaluated, however, had a high risk of bias. Some conflicting evidence exists in the literature on transdermal buprenorphine use in the ICU. Patanwala et al. state that the use of TDB in post-surgical ICU patients did not improve pain scores or pain control.[40] The mean opioid consumption did not differ between the TDB and control groups. These findings necessitate randomized controlled trials to compare the benefits of Buprenorphine in pain control in the ICU.

Hamata et al. describe a case report on buprenorphine/naloxone initiation in an intubated patient with a history of OUD and opioid withdrawal using a rapid micro-induction technique.[41] The authors report no signs of precipitated withdrawal.

In a study by Feeney et al. on patients with approximately 100,000 opioid use disorder patients in the ICU, 19% of patients received medication for opioid use disorder, of which 14.4 % received buprenorphine and 20.6% received buprenorphine/naloxone.[42] Vanini et al. described buprenorphine induction for patients admitted to the ICU with a history of OUD.[35] Sixty percent underwent standard buprenorphine induction (2 mg dose after an 8–12-hour washout period) compared to 40% who received low-dose induction (5-d titration from 150 μg to 4 mg four times daily). Buprenorphine induction in the ICU for OUD was associated with a low risk of precipitating withdrawal. Use of buprenorphine was also associated with a reduction in morphine use calculated by Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) from 1057 to 262 mg cumulatively in 24 hours after initiation.

Adverse effects
According to some studies, Methadone is associated with cardiotoxic effects, especially with higher doses, according to some studies. Effects included arrhythmias, QT prolongation (>200mg/day), and torsade de pointes.[43] Therefore, regularly monitoring QT levels for patients with baseline duration >450 ms in the prior 3 months while on methadone. Close monitoring is required if patients are on additional medications that can prolong the QT interval, including antimicrobials, Antiemetics, antiarrhythmics, or hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia. It is contraindicated if the QT interval is >500 ms.[19]

Intraoperative methadone is often used to provide post-operative analgesia. Some studies report respiratory depression following intraoperative methadone administration.[44] Whereas many studies report no adverse effect of methadone on respiratory parameters, including hypoxemia, hypoventilation, and extubation time.[30,45,46] Respiratory depression requires reversal with naloxone. There was no difference in the use of naloxone to reverse respiratory depression between methadone vs. morphine (0.62% vs. 0.56%) in a study by Carle et al.[47] The use of methadone was associated with a longer post-anesthesia care unit length of stay of 334 vs. 195 minutes with morphine. Therefore, methadone and morphine have a comparable safety profile for respiratory depression. Methadone can alter serotonin reuptake at high doses and has drug-drug interactions with fentanyl, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and antiemetics used in the ICU.

Buprenorphine can be given as a monthly/ weekly prescription to outpatients, whereas methadone requires daily visits to methadone clinics. QT interval prolongation is more frequent with methadone and often at lower doses than with Buprenorphine. After a dose of >40 mcg/hr. Supratherapeutic dose QT interval prolongation was seen with buprenorphine in some studies. Buprenorphine has less respiratory depression than methadone due to its ceiling effect.

Cicozzi et al. describe the use of high-dose buprenorphine for pain in terminally ill patients with liver failure and kidney failure.[48] Buprenorphine can be used with mild to moderate opioid dependence, whereas methadone can be used with mild to severe dependence. Cross-taper from methadone to buprenorphine may be necessary due to the adverse effects of methadone. This can lead to precipitated withdrawal when partial agonist buprenorphine replaces the full agonist methadone at receptors. The withdrawal is often prolonged and requires close monitoring.[49,50]

Challenges and considerations for implementation, future directions, and research
ICU teams should have access to pain physicians and addiction teams. Outpatient resources for patients with opioid use disorder, including naloxone, should be dispensed/given a prescription on discharge. Continuing medical education activity on pain and addiction medicine can help current ICU teams manage patients with OUD, use buprenorphine and methadone in the ICU, and prevent overdose with naloxone.[12] Further studies are needed to determine the dose, frequency, and duration of therapy for the conversion of IV opioids to enteral methadone based on patient profiles, pharmacokinetics, and comorbidities.

Standardized scales for monitoring opioid withdrawal, particularly in ICU patients, need to be enforced. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – fifth edition (DSM-V) is the only appropriate scale for mechanically ventilated patients apart from the clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) for awake patients. For patients requiring mechanical ventilation or those unable to communicate symptoms, instruments such as the critical care pain observation tool and the behavioral pain scale should be considered to assess pain.

Studies to determine the beneficial effects of methadone or buprenorphine on quality and duration of recovery post-surgery, hospital length of stay, outcomes after discharge, and development of chronic postsurgical pain are needed.[21] A multidisciplinary team approach with interaction between ICU physicians, nurses, addiction, pain control specialists, and anesthesiologists can help to approach MOUD in ICU patients with greater success.

Core Tip: Management of opioid use disorder (OUD) in ICU patients is challenging due to multiorgan dysfunction, comorbidities, and complex medication interactions. Effective use of methadone and buprenorphine is essential for pain control and OUD treatment. Studies indicate the benefits of these medications for transitioning from IV to oral opioids, managing withdrawal, and reducing postoperative pain. Knowledge from this manuscript can help ICU physicians understand the scope of Methadone and Buprenorphine in the ICU.

Conclusion

Buprenorphine and Methadone have scope for use in the ICU in pain control and opioid use disorder. Utilization may improve patient outcomes and reduce the rising burden of opioid use.

References

  1. Erstad BL, Glenn MJ. Management of Critically Ill Patients Receiving Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Chest. 2024;165(2):356-367. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.024
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Zubrzycki M, Liebold A, Skrabal C, et al. Assessment and pathophysiology of pain in cardiac surgery. J Pain Res. 2018;11:1599-1611. doi:10.2147/JPR.S162067
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devlin JW. Buprenorphine: Its Emerging Role as a Strategy to Reduce Full Opioid Agonist Use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(12):1817-1819. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006052
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casamento A, Ghosh A, Hui V, Neto AS. Hospital and long-term opioid use according to analgosedation with fentanyl vs. morphine: Findings from the ANALGESIC trial. Crit Care Resusc. 2024;26(1):24-31. doi:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.004
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn LK, Taylor DG, Smith SJ, et al. Persistent post-discharge opioid prescribing after traumatic brain injury requiring intensive care unit admission: A cross-sectional study with longitudinal outcome. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225787. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225787
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adil MQ, De La Cruz A, Thornton JD, Wanat MA. Incidence of Chronic Opioid Use in Previously Opioid-Naïve Patients Receiving Opioids for Analgesia in the Intensive Care Unit. Fed Pract. 2020;37(4):170-176.
    Incidence of Chronic Opioid Use in Previously Opioid-Naïve Patients Receiving Opioids for Analgesia in the Intensive Care Unit
  7. Krancevich NM, Belfer JJ, Draper HM, Schmidt KJ. Impact of Opioid Administration in the Intensive Care Unit and Subsequent Use in Opioid-Naïve Patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2022;56(1):52-59. doi:10.1177/10600280211016856
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wunsch H, Hill AD, Fu L, et al. New Opioid Use after Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Hospital Discharge. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(4):568-575. doi:10.1164/rccm.201912-2503OC
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu Z, Karamesinis AD, Plummer M, et al. Epidemiology of persistent postoperative opioid use after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(3):366-377. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.026
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma CH, Tworek KB, Kung JY, et al. Systemic Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories for Analgesia in Postoperative Critical Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Crit Care Explor. 2023;5(7):e0938. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000938
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. Overdyk FJ, Dowling O, Marino J, et al. Association of Opioids and Sedatives with Increased Risk of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest from an Administrative Database. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0150214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150214
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reichheld AM, Hills-Evans K, Sheehan JK, et al. A national survey of approaches to manage the ICU patient with opioid use disorder. J Crit Care. 2019;54:42-47. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.032
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown R, Kraus C, Fleming M, Reddy S. Methadone: applied pharmacology and use as adjunctive treatment in chronic pain. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(949):654-659. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.022988
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhao YL, Chen SR, Chen H, Pan HL. Chronic opioid potentiates presynaptic but impairs postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activity in spinal cords: implications for opioid hyperalgesia and tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(30):25073-25085. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.378737
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCance-Katz EF, Sullivan LE, Nallani S. Drug interactions of clinical importance among the opioids, methadone, buprenorphine, and other frequently prescribed medications: a review. Am J Addict. 2010;19(1):4-16. doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2009.00005.x
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohammadi M, Kazeminia M, Abdoli N, et al. The effect of methadone on depression among addicts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):373. doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01599-3
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  17. McPherson ML, Walker KA, Davis MP, et al. Safe and Appropriate Use of Methadone in Hospice and Palliative Care: Expert Consensus White Paper. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;57(3):635-645.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.001
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weschules DJ, Bain KT, Richeimer S. Actual and potential drug interactions associated with methadone. Pain Med. 2008;9(3):315-344. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00289.x
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palat G, Chary S. Practical Guide for Using Methadone in Pain and Palliative Care Practice. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24(Suppl 1):S21-S29. doi:10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_186_17
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  20. González-Barboteo J, Porta-Sales J, Nabal-Vicuña M, et al. Switching Ratio from Parenteral to Oral Methadone 1:1.2 Is Safer Compared with Ratio 1:2 in Patients with Controlled Cancer Pain: A Multicenter Randomized-Controlled Trial (RATIOMTD-010810). J Palliat Med. 2021;24(3):382-390. doi:10.1089/jpm.2020.0244
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy GS, Szokol JW. Intraoperative Methadone in Surgical Patients: A Review of Clinical Investigations. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(3):678-692. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002755
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coe MA, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL. Buprenorphine Pharmacology Review: Update on Transmucosal and Long-acting Formulations. J Addict Med. 2019;13(2):93-103. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000457
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dong SA, Guo Y, Liu SS, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing remimazolam to propofol when combined with alfentanil for sedation during ERCP procedures. J Clin Anesth. 2023;86:111077. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111077
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  24. Welsh CJ, Suman M, Cohen A, Broyles L, Bennett M, Weintraub E. The use of intravenous buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in medically ill hospitalized patients. Am J Addict. 2002;11(2):135-140. doi:10.1080/105500490290087901
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  25. Azimi HA, Keats KR, Sulejmani E, Ortiz K, Waller J, Wayne N. Use of Methadone Versus Oxycodone to Facilitate Weaning of Parenteral Opioids in Critically Ill Adult Patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2023;57(10):1129-1136. doi:10.1177/10600280221151106
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srinivasan V, Pung D, O’Neill SP. Conversion from prolonged intravenous fentanyl infusion to enteral methadone in critically ill children. World J Clin Pediatr. 2017;6(2):110-117. doi:10.5409/wjcp.v6.i2.110
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wanzuita R, Poli-de-Figueiredo LF, Pfuetzenreiter F, Cavalcanti AB, Westphal GA. Replacement of fentanyl infusion by enteral methadone decreases the weaning time from mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2012;16(2):R49. doi:10.1186/cc11250
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klaire S, Fairbairn N, Ryan A, Nolan S, McLean M, Bach P. Safety and Efficacy of Rapid Methadone Titration for Opioid Use Disorder in an Inpatient Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Addict Med. 2023;17(6):711-713. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000001207
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  29. Najafi B, Shadnia S, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Heydarian A, Mahdavinejad A, Zamani N. Fentanyl versus Methadone in Management of Withdrawal Syndrome in Opioid Addicted Patients; a Pilot Clinical Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e62. doi:10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1384
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, et al. Intraoperative Methadone for the Prevention of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial in Cardiac Surgical Patients. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):1112-1122. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000633
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh K, Tsang S, Zvara J, et al. Intraoperative Methadone Use Is Associated With Reduced Postoperative Pain and More Rapid Opioid Weaning After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(8):1699-1706. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.05.012
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fürst P, Lundström S, Klepstad P, Runesdotter S, Strang P. Improved Pain Control in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients by Introducing Low-Dose Oral Methadone in Addition to Ongoing Opioid Treatment. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(2):177-181. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0157
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  33. Bastian K, Buehler PK, Slizyte D, et al. A preoperative single dose of methadone for moderate-to-severely painful surgery reduces postoperative morphine consumption. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(10):1053-1061. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13136-7
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitaka C, Sakanishi N, Tsunoda Y, Mishima Y. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of morphine, butorphanol, buprenorphine and pentazocine on ICU patients. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1985;32(2):31-39.
    Comparison of hemodynamic effects of morphine, butorphanol, buprenorphine, and pentazocine on ICU patients
  35. Vanini DJ, Corvelli JM, Maynard KM, et al. Practices and Outcomes Associated With Sublingual Buprenorphine Use in a Critically Ill Population. Crit Care Explor. 2024;6(3):e1062. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001062
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quaye A, Wampole C, Riker RR, et al. Buprenorphine Continuation During Critical Illness Associated With Decreased Inpatient Opioid Use in Individuals Maintained on Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder in a Retrospective Study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;63(9):1067-1073. doi:10.1002/jcph.2286
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quaye A, Wampole C, Riker RR, et al. Medications for opioid use disorder prescribed at hospital discharge associated with decreased opioid agonist dispensing in patients with opioid use disorder requiring critical care: A retrospective study. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023;155:209176. doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209176
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patanwala AE, Moran B, Johnstone C, Koelzow H, Penm J. Effectiveness of Sublingual Buprenorphine for Pain Control in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(12):1650-1658. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006031
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  39. Machado FC, Neto GC, Paiva LO, et al. Transdermal buprenorphine for acute postoperative pain: a systematic review. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(4):419-428. doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.004
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patanwala AE, Moran B, Johnstone C, Koelzow H, Penm J. Effectiveness of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Pain Control in the ICU After Major Surgical Procedures. Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(4):e0665. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000665
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamata B, Griesdale D, Hann J, Rezazadeh-Azar P. Rapid Micro-induction of Buprenorphine/Naloxone for Opioid Use Disorder in a Critically ill Intubated Patient: A Case Report. J Addict Med. 2020;14(6):514-517. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000675
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  42. Feeney ME, Law AC, Walkey AJ, Bosch NA. Variation in Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Critically Ill Patients Across the United States. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(7):e365-e375. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006257
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  43. Alinejad S, Kazemi T, Zamani N, Hoffman RS, Mehrpour O. A systematic review of the cardiotoxicity of methadone. EXCLI J. 2015;14:577-600. doi:10.17179/excli2015-553
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dunn LK, Yerra S, Fang S, et al. The safety profile of intraoperative methadone for analgesia after major spine surgery: An observational study of 1,478 patients. J Opioid Manag. 2018;14(2):83-87. doi:10.5055/jom.2018.0435
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  45. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, et al. Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Intraoperative Methadone in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(5):822-833. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001609
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  46. Carvalho AC, Sebold FJG, Calegari PMG, Oliveira BH, Schuelter-Trevisol F. Comparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018;68(2):122-127. doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2017.09.005
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  47. Carlé N, Nikolajsen L, Uhrbrand CG. Respiratory Depression Following Intraoperative Methadone: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2025;140(3):516-523. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007018
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nazarian S, Glover B, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Teare J. Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e27370. doi:10.2196/27370
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  49. Erstad BL, Glenn MJ. Considerations and limitations of buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder in the intensive care unit setting: A narrative review. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024;81(6):171-182. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxad289
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whelan PJ, Remski K. Buprenorphine vs. methadone treatment: A review of evidence in both developed and developing worlds. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012;3(1):45-50. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.91934
    PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Acknowledgments

Not reported

Funding

Not reported

Author Information

Corresponding Author:
Praveen Reddy Elmati
Department of Anesthesiology
Saint Clare’s Hospital, Dover, NJ, USA, 07081
Email: praveen.elmati@gmail.com

Co-Authors:
Gowthami Sai Kogilathota Jagirdhar
Department of Gastroenterology
Saint Michaels Medical Center Newark, NJ, USA, 07104

Teja Nagaradona
Department of Medicine
St. Georges University School of Medicine, West Indies, Grenada, 11739

Suresh Srinivasan
Department of Pain Medicine
Trinity Health System, Steubenville, OH, USA

Authors Contributions

Elmati PR designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; Elmati PR, Kogilathota Jagirdhar GS, Nagaradona T performed the research and analyzed the data; Elmati PR, Kogilathota Jagirdhar GS, Nagaradona T, and Srinivasan S contributed to the manuscript’s writing and editing; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Guarantor

None

DOI

Cite this Article

Praveen RE, Gowthami SKJ, Teja N, Suresh S. Methadone and Buprenorphine Use in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mini Review. medtigo J Anesth Pain Med. 2025;1(1):e3067116. doi:10.63096/medtigo3067116 Crossref