medtigo Journal of Medicine

|Original Research

| Volume 4, Issue 2

Factors Contributing to the Theory-Practice Gap Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rawalpindi


Author Affiliations

medtigo J Med. |
Date - Received: Feb 10, 2026,
Accepted: Feb 13, 2026,
Published: Apr 29, 2026.

Abstract

Background: The theory-practice gap in nursing refers to the discrepancy between knowledge acquired in classrooms and its application in clinical settings. This gap affects clinical competence and quality of care.
Aim: To identify factors contributing to the theory-practice gap among nursing students at the College of Nursing, Rawalpindi.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over three months (October-December 2020). A convenience sample of 126 nursing students from 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year was included. Data were collected using a validated structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81). Descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square and Fisher’s exact test) were applied using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.
Results: A total of 126 students participated; 60.8% perceived the existence of a theory-practice gap. A statistically significant association was found between academic year and extent of gap (p < 0.001), while no significant association was observed between academic year and perception of the gap (p = 0.15). Major contributing factors included ineffective clinical supervision, lack of objective assessment, inadequate clinical support, student-related knowledge deficits, and unsupportive clinical environments.
Conclusion: The theory-practice gap remains a significant issue in nursing education. Strengthening clinical supervision, improving collaboration between academic and clinical settings, and enhancing student preparedness can help reduce this gap.

Keywords

Theory-practice gap, Nursing students, Clinical instructors, Clinical learning environment, Nursing education.

Introduction

Theoretical and practical experience are equally important ingredients of an integrated mixture of nursing degrees to enrich the capability of nursing students.[1] Clinical experience is considered to be the most widespread source regarding anxiety and stress-producing factors throughout the nursing degree program, and it is an important part of curriculum of nursing.[2,3] The term “theory-practice gap” is most often used without understanding its underlying concepts and description; hence, a few words widely used for “gap” are “bridged,” “breached,” or “avoided.” [4] The complexity of integrating theoretical knowledge into practice has been widely debated in nursing education literature, emphasizing the persistent disconnect between knowledge and application.[5,6]

The researchers examined that the transition of theoretical knowledge into practical work is the most difficult transition for the students and freshly graduated nurses.[2] Around the globe, the gap between practice and theory is reported, documented, and dialogued in the literature.[7] The theory-practice gap can be defined as the discrepancy and contradiction between what students attain in the classroom versus what they exhibit and produce in the clinical environment.[8] Similar findings have been reported among nursing students in different contexts, including studies from Africa and other developing regions, where students experience difficulty applying classroom knowledge in clinical settings.[9] Clinical nurse teachers and mentors play a vital role in reducing the gap of theory and practice by creating a helping and enhancing working environment and letting students participate in practical work as a responsible partner.[10] Effective transition programs and structured clinical support systems have also been identified as essential strategies to bridge this gap.[11]

The study is intended to explore and rectify the shortcomings that are widening the theory-practice gap among student nurses at the College of Nursing, Rawalpindi. A study related to the transition from student to ward nurse was published in the Association of Black Nurses Federation Journal. The researcher revealed that most newly graduated nurses suffer from stress due to expectations from them while they face a huge difficulty in converting their theoretical knowledge into practice, hence causing compromise in effective patient care.[12] In addition, gaps in knowledge and clinical practice have also been identified in local contexts such as Pakistan, particularly among pediatric nurses working in tertiary care hospitals.[13] The theoretical and practical dimensions of nursing, often described as both an art and a science, further complicate the integration process in clinical learning environments.[14]

Methodology

Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used.

Setting and sample: The study was conducted at the College of Nursing, Rawalpindi. A convenience sample of 126 nursing students from 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year was recruited. First-year students were excluded due to limited clinical exposure.

Data collection and instrumentation: A validated, self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of three sections: instructor-related factors, student-related factors, and environmental factors. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81.

Operational definition: The theory-practice gap was defined as the perceived discrepancy between theoretical knowledge and its clinical application, measured using Likert-scale responses.

Scoring system: A 3-point Likert scale was used (Agree = 1, Disagree = 2, Don’t Know = 3), where lower scores indicated stronger agreement.

Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained.

Data analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) and inferential statistics (chi-square and Fisher’s exact test) were applied. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Descriptive statistics:
Sociodemographic characteristics: The mean age of participants was 21.21 ± 1.45 years. All participants were female. Most students were from the second year (46.8%). A total of 60.8% of students perceived the presence of a theory-practice gap. Regarding the extent of the gap, 45.5% reported it as large, 37.3% as moderate, and 18.2% as small.

Sr. no Characteristics No of representatives %age
1 1st year 0 0%
2 2nd year 59 46.8%
3 3rd year 29 23%
4 4th year 38 30.2
5 Perception of gap

Yes

No

 

 

73

53

 

60.8%

39.2%

6 Extent of gap

Big

Moderate

Low

 

57

47

22

 

45.5%

37.3%

18.2%

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

Variables related to the instructor during the practice period: Instructor-related factors such as lack of supervision, ineffective teaching methods, and insufficient feedback were highly reported contributors.

Sr. no Item Agree Disagree Don’t know
1 The inefficiency of instructors at the clinical training site contributed to the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. 101 (80.2%) 19 (15.1%) 6 (4.8%)
2 The lack of commitment of the instructor in the training place contributed to creating this gap. 84 (66.7%) 27 (21.4%) 15 (11.9%)
3 The instructor’s supervision and evaluation of our performance during training contributed to identifying the gap between theory and practice. 82 (64.8%) 34 (27.2%) 10 (8%)
4 Lack of supervision for us as students by the trainers in the training place contributes to the existence of this gap. 84 (66.7%) 35 (27.8%) 7 (5.6%)
5 The lack of support provided by the instructor during the training period contributed to the gap between theory and practice. 81 (64.3%) 36 (28.6%) 9 (7.1%)
6 The teaching and training methods used during the period were characterized by neglect and insufficient guidance, which contributed to the emergence of the gap between theory and practice. 71 (56%) 43 (34.4%) 12 (9.6%)
7 The absence of the instructor during the training period contributed to the development of the gap between theory and practice. 78 (61.9%) 31 (24.6%) 17 (13.5%)
8 The lack of interest in the objectives of course outlines, which were expected from the training site, was a main reason to create a gap between what we have learned in college and what we found actually. 81 (64.3%) 39 (31%) 6 (4.8%)
9 Feedback and evaluation by the instructor are not enough. 76 (60.3%) 41 (32.5%) 9 (7.1%)
10 I am often unable to locate my clinical instructor for one-on-one practice and guidance. 81 (64.3%) 31(24.6%) 14 (11.1%)
11 Clinical instructors do not assess students objectively. 93 (73.8%) 29 (23%) 4 (3.2%)
12 Clinical instructors are unable to ensure effective cooperation with ward personnel. 78 (61.9%) 36 (28.6%) 12 (9.5%)

Table 2: Description of variables associated with the instructor during the practice period

Variables related to students: Student-related factors included lack of knowledge, low confidence, and fear of clinical settings.

Sr. no Items Agree

 

Disagree

 

I don’t know
1 The lack of information that I have as a student was a direct cause of the existence of a gap between theory and practice. 92 (73%) 29 (23%) 5 (4%)
2 My lack of knowledge contributed to low self-confidence as a new student, which in turn led to a gap between theory and practice. 74 (58.7%) 41 (32.5%) 11 (8.7%)
3 Fear of the new clinical training environment also contributed to the development of this gap. 63 (50%) 53 (42.1%) 10 (7.9%)
4 Additionally, fear of applying theoretical knowledge to real patients during clinical practice further widened the gap between theory and practice. 55 (43.7%) 65 (51.6%) 6 (4.8%)
5 The lack of my commitment as a student during the period of my study, and my academic carelessness in both college and training, contributed to the creation of a gap between the theoretical and practical side. 47 (37.3%) 69 (54.8%) 10 (7.9%)
6 The difference between the educational programs in educational institutes, contributed to the creation of gap between theory and practice. 70 (55.6%) 40 (31.7%) 16 (12.7%)
7 The weakness of my academic achievement during the study was the reason of creating this gap that I have. 43 (34.1%) 66 (52.4%) 17 (13.5%)
8 I did not train in my workplace previously. 55 (43.7%) 62 (49.2%) 9 (7.1%)
9 My lack of initiative contributed to the emergence of the gap between theory and practice. 57 (45.2%) 58 (46%) 11 (8.7%)
10 Fully depending on the teacher to explain the material and lack of early preparations, contributed to the emergence of this gap 43 (34.1%) 68 (54%) 15 (11.9%)
11 I cannot transfer theoretical knowledge into practice 50 (39.7%) 70 (55.6%) 6 (4.8%)

Table 3: Descriptives of variables related to students

Variables related to ward personnel and environment: Environmental factors included lack of resources, limited cooperation from staff, and inadequate learning facilities.

Sr. no Item Agree Disagree Don’t know
1 The limited availability and at times absence of medical equipment in the hospital prevented me from performing procedures effectively. 79 (62.7%) 41 (32.5%) 6 (4.8%)
2 Lack of adequate educational opportunities in training place is the cause of creating this gap. 78 (61.9%) 42 (33.3%) 6 (4.8%)
3 Fear of applying what we have learned to real patients contributed to the development of the theory-practice gap. 62 (49.2%) 53 (42.1%) 11 (8.7%)
4 The lack of cooperation from nursing staff during training also played a role in creating this gap. 80 (63.5%) 42 (33.3%) 4 (3.2%)
5 Being assigned tasks unrelated to patient care further widened the gap between theory and practice. 92 (72.8%) 29 (23.2%) 5 (4%)
6 The absence of a supportive environment where classroom-learned procedures could be practiced contributed to the existence of this gap. 84 (66.7%) 30 (23.8%) 12 (9.5%)
7 Being excluded by ward personnel. 76 (60.3%) 42 (33.3%) 8 (6.3%)
8 Not having a room and lockers for students. 86 (68.3%) 35 (27.8%) 5 (4%)
9 The absence of opportunities for joint meetings between teaching faculty and students contributed to the gap between theory and practice. 91 (72.2%) 30 (23.8%) 5 (4%)

Table 4: Descriptives of variables related to ward personnel and environment

Inferential statistics: Fisher’s exact test showed a statistically significant association between academic year and extent of the gap (p < 0.001). However, no significant association was found between academic year and perception of the gap (p = 0.15). Chi square and Fisher exact test of significance was applied between academic year of respondents and perceptions of respondents about existence of the theoretical and practical gap and extent of gap according to the respondents, respectively. Fisher exact test shows that a statistically strong association exists between academic year of respondents and extent of gap that exists according to these respondents (small, moderate, big) (p= 0.000), whereas Chi square test of significance between academic year and perceptions of respondents about existence of the theoretical and practical gap shows no association (p=0.15). Cross tabulation of the variables is presented below in table 5.

1. Academic rear Perceptions of respondents

Yes                            No

2nd 23                                      14
3rd 19                                      24
4th 31                                       15
2. Academic rear Extent of gap that exists
Small Moderate Big
2nd 0 22 25
3rd 4 19 18
4th 18 6 14

Table 5: Cross tabulation of variables

Discussion

The findings indicate that the theory-practice gap remains a significant issue among nursing students. The majority of students reported difficulty in applying theoretical knowledge in clinical settings, reflecting a disconnect between academic preparation and practical experience. Instructor-related factors emerged as key contributors. Ineffective supervision, lack of feedback, and inadequate evaluation hinder students’ ability to integrate theory into practice. This highlights the importance of active instructor engagement in clinical teaching.

Student-related factors such as insufficient knowledge, lack of confidence, and fear of clinical environments further exacerbate the gap. These findings suggest the need for enhanced academic preparation and supportive learning strategies. Environmental factors, including lack of resources, limited staff cooperation, and non-supportive clinical environments, also play a significant role. A collaborative and resource-rich clinical setting is essential for effective learning.

Recommendations

  • Strengthen the role of clinical instructors in supervision and mentoring
  • Improve collaboration between academic institutions and healthcare facilities
  • Provide simulation-based training for students
  • Ensure availability of adequate clinical resources
  • Conduct further large-scale and mixed-method research studies

Conclusion

The findings of this study demonstrate that the theory-practice gap remains a significant and persistent challenge among nursing students. A considerable proportion of participants reported difficulty in translating theoretical knowledge into clinical practice, reflecting a clear disconnect between classroom learning and real-world application. This finding is consistent with previous studies conducted in diverse contexts, which highlight that nursing students frequently struggle to integrate knowledge due to differences between idealized teaching and practical realities in clinical environments.[7,9]

Instructor-related factors emerged as one of the most influential contributors to the theory-practice gap. Students reported issues such as ineffective supervision, lack of timely feedback, and inadequate objective evaluation. These findings align with earlier research emphasizing that clinical instructors play a pivotal role in facilitating the integration of theory into practice through guidance, mentorship, and constructive evaluation.[10,15] Poor instructional strategies and weak coordination between academic and clinical educators further widen this gap, as also discussed in studies exploring inconsistencies in teaching methodologies among nurse educators.[15]

Student-related factors also significantly contributed to the gap. Participants identified lack of knowledge, low self-confidence, and fear of engaging in clinical practice as major barriers. These findings are supported by existing literature, which indicates that students often feel unprepared and anxious when transitioning into clinical settings, ultimately affecting their performance and learning outcomes.[2,9] Additionally, reliance on passive learning approaches and limited self-directed preparation further exacerbate the inability to apply theoretical concepts in practice. This reflects the broader issue of inadequate preparation strategies and insufficient emphasis on critical thinking in nursing education.[11]

Environmental and organizational factors were also found to play a critical role. The lack of resources, limited cooperation from ward staff, and non-supportive clinical environments were frequently reported by students. These findings are consistent with studies conducted in both developed and resource-constrained settings, where insufficient infrastructure and lack of collaboration between academic institutions and healthcare facilities hinder effective clinical learning.[7,13] In particular, studies in local and regional contexts have highlighted how resource limitations and workplace dynamics negatively impact the practical training of nursing students.[13]

Furthermore, the findings of this study reinforce the notion that the theory-practice gap is a multifaceted issue influenced by the interplay of educational, personal, and systemic factors. Nursing, being both an art and a science, requires a balance between theoretical knowledge and practical competence, which is often difficult to achieve in traditional educational models.[6,11] The persistence of this gap suggests the need for innovative teaching approaches, including simulation-based learning, competency-based education, and stronger integration of clinical experiences within the curriculum.

The significant association found between academic year and the extent of the theory-practice gap indicates that students’ perceptions evolve with increased clinical exposure. Senior students reported a greater awareness of the gap, possibly due to their deeper engagement in clinical settings and increased responsibility. Similar trends have been observed in previous studies, where advanced students demonstrate a more critical understanding of discrepancies between theory and practice.[9]

Overall, the findings of this study are in agreement with global literature, confirming that the theory-practice gap is a widespread issue in nursing education. Addressing this challenge requires a collaborative effort involving educators, clinical instructors, and healthcare institutions. Strengthening clinical supervision, enhancing communication between academic and practice settings, and fostering active student engagement are essential steps toward minimizing this gap. Additionally, structured transition programs and continuous professional development for educators can further support the effective integration of theory into practice.[11]

References

  1. Tanrıverdi G, Özyazıcıoğlu N, Yalçın Gürsoy M. The recommended solutions of nursing students to bridge the gap between the school and practice areas. 2020.
    The Recommended Solutions of Nursing Students to Bridge the Gap between the School and Practice Areas
  2. Lee JE, Sim IO. Gap between college education and clinical practice: Experience of newly graduated nurses. Nurse Open. 2019;7(1):449-456. doi:10.1002/nop2.409
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  3. Amro N, Sous A, Shkherat S, Nahli H, Hassasneh R, Slimi A. The theory–practice gap among nursing and midwifery students in Palestine. Int J Innov Res Med Sci. 2017;2(11):1508-1514. doi:10.23958/ijirms/vol02-i11/12 Crossref | Google Scholar
  4. Greenway K, Butt G, Walthall H. What is a theory-practice gap? An exploration of the concept. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;34:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.005
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  5. Ousey K, Gallagher P. The theory-practice relationship in nursing: a debate. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007;7(4):199-205. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.02.001
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  6. Risjord M. Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. 2011.
    Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy
  7. Abu Salah A, Aljerjawy M, Salama A. Gap between theory and practice in the nursing education: the role of clinical setting. JOJ Nurse Health Care. 2018;7(2):555707. doi:10.19080/JOJNHC.2018.07.555707
    Crossref | Google Scholar
  8. Factor EMR, Matienzo ET, de Guzman AB. A square peg in a round hole: Theory-practice gap from the lens of Filipino student nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;57:82-87. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.004
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  9. Odetola T, Oluwasola O, Pimmer C, et al. Theory-practice gap: the experiences of Nigerian nursing students. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2018;20(1). doi:10.25159/2520-5293/3694
    Crossref | Google Scholar
  10. Abusalah A, Aljerjawy M, Salama A. The role of clinical instructor in bridging the gap between theory and practice in nursing education. 2019:2-876.
    The Role of Clinical Instructor in Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Nursing Education
  11. Rush KL, Adamack M, Gordon J, Lilly M, Janke R. Best practices of formal new graduate nurse transition programs: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(3):345-356. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.06.009
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  12. Salifu DA, Gross J, Salifu MA, Ninnoni JP. Experiences and perceptions of the theory-practice gap in nursing in a resource-constrained setting: A qualitative description study. Nurs Open. 2018;6(1):72-83. doi:10.1002/nop2.188
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  13. Roshan Essani R, Ali TS. Knowledge and Practice Gaps among Pediatric Nurses at a Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi Pakistan. ISRN Pediatr. 2011;2011:460818. doi:10.5402/2011/460818
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  14. Jasmine T. Art, science, or both? Keeping the care in nursing. Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;44(4):415-421. doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.003
    PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar
  15. Van Zyl AE. Exploring the potential theory-practice gap in the teaching methods of nurse educators. Doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch University; 2014.
    Exploring the potential theory-practice gap in the teaching methods of nurse educators

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the support of the College of Nursing, Rawalpindi, and all participating students for their valuable contribution to this study.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author Information

Corresponding Author:
Nadira Nasim
Department of Nursing
College of Nursing, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Email: [email protected]

Co-Author:
Tahseen Raana
Department of Nursing
College of Nursing, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Authors Contributions

Nadira Nasim (Corresponding Author) made the primary contribution to this study, including conceptualization and design of the research, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. She also took the lead in revising and finalizing the article for publication. Tehseen Raana contributed to the study by supporting the research design, assisting in data interpretation, and critically reviewing and editing the manuscript for important intellectual content. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Armed Forces Postgraduate Medical Institute (AFPGMI), Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Guarantor

None

DOI

Cite this Article

Nasim N, Raana T. Factors Contributing to the Theory-Practice Gap Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rawalpindi. medtigo J Med. 2026;4(2):e3062426. doi:10.63096/medtigo3062426 Crossref