Author Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Critical thinking is a cornerstone of nursing practice, essential for effective clinical judgment, decision-making, and patient safety. Despite its recognized importance, the concept of critical thinking remains inconsistently defined and variably applied in nursing education and practice, particularly within the Pakistani context.
Objective: This concept analysis aims to clarify and define critical thinking in nursing education by examining its attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents.
Methodology: Walker and Avant’s eight-step concept analysis framework was employed. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online Library. Relevant peer-reviewed articles, textbooks, and theoretical papers were reviewed to explore definitions, uses, surrogate terms, defining attributes, and measurement indicators of critical thinking in nursing.
Results: Critical thinking in nursing was identified as a multidimensional cognitive process characterized by analysis, evaluation, clinical reasoning, problem-solving, decision-making, creativity, and open-mindedness. Antecedents included formal education, clinical exposure, supportive learning environments, and individual cognitive traits. Consequences encompassed improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of care, professional satisfaction, and safer clinical practice. The Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal emerged as a key empirical referent for measuring critical thinking abilities.
Conclusion: This concept analysis provides a comprehensive and clarified understanding of critical thinking in nursing. A shared conceptualization can support curriculum development, guide teaching strategies, and strengthen clinical practice, ultimately contributing to improved patient care and professional competence among nurses.
Keywords
Critical thinking, Nursing education, Watson–Glaser critical thinking appraisal, Consequences, Attributes, Antecedents, Concept analysis.
Introduction
Critical thinking is a vital and basic component of management, decision-making, clinical judgement, professional accomplishment, and effective community collaboration.[1] It is essential in nursing practice, allowing nurses to evaluate difficult circumstances, make educated decisions, and provide high-quality care.[2] It is a fundamental ability in nursing practice, required for providing safe and effective patient care. The notion of critical thinking may be traced back to around 2500 years ago, when Socrates encouraged and challenged his students to enquire and approach problems in an amateur manner while maintaining an open mind.[3] Despite widespread agreement among professionals on the usefulness of critical thinking, there is significant dispute over its nature and meaning. A similar issue exists in nursing. Most nursing educators agree on the necessity of critical thinking, but few agree on a single, complete definition of the term.[4] The application of critical thinking in nursing has resulted in considerable misunderstanding and doubt. Confusion and uncertainty arise when nurses, nurse educators, and students use critical thinking interchangeably with other related terms and ideas with varying meanings.[5] The goal of this study is to analyse and define the notion of critical thinking in nursing education in Pakistan.
Methodology
Walker and Avant’s approach is used to analyze the idea of “critical thinking”. This model was released in 1986. It is the most often utilized approach in nursing since it allows graduates to grasp and describe the process more thoroughly. This technique entails finding conceptual and practical meanings, antecedents – defining qualities, results, and empirical referents of the idea, as well as analyzing examples of its application.[6]
Literature search: A systematic review was conducted using Cochrane’s guidelines, including five categories. Various databases were utilized, including PubMed, CINAHL, and science direct, Medline, and the online Wiley library. Keywords were searched by using Boolean operators, including AND, OR, NOT, Critical thinking, and Nursing.
Selection of concepts and their significance in nursing: Nurses face complicated and frequently changing settings in clinical practice. Critical thinking enables nurses to analyze data, evaluate many viewpoints, and make educated decisions that result in better patient outcomes. It enables nurses to prioritize treatment, foresee difficulties, and tailor interventions to patient requirements. As a result, choosing critical thinking in nursing as a concept is extremely important because it emphasizes critical thinking’s foundational role in nursing practice, its impact on patient outcomes and safety, problem solving and innovation, advocacy and empowerment, and the importance of continuing professional development in nursing.
Purpose of the analysis: The purpose of conducting a concept analysis on critical thinking in nursing is to gain a deeper understanding of the concept’s meaning. The concept analysis aims to clarify any ambiguity surrounding the definition and usage of critical thinking in nursing, ensuring a shared understanding among nurses, educators, researchers, and policymakers by elucidating the nature and significance of critical thinking in nursing.
Definitions of Critical thinking in nursing: critical thinking in nursing has four terms, which are critical, thinking, critical thinking, and nursing, and is completed by defining all these terms.
Critical
Critical refers to the objective evaluation and analysis of issues, ideas, or situations, often involving a questioning or skeptical mindset.[7]
Thinking
Thinking refers to the cognitive processes involved in mental activities such as reasoning, problem-solving, decision-making, and creativity.[8]
Critical thinking
Critical thinking refers to the disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to guide belief and action.[9,20]
Nursing
Nursing is a profession focused on promoting health, preventing illness, and providing holistic care to individuals, families, and communities across the lifespan.[10]
Critical thinking in nursing
Critical thinking in nursing involves the application of cognitive skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation to clinical situations to develop safe, effective, and evidence-based nursing care.[2]
Identification of all possible uses of the concept: In health care, it can be used in clinical decision making, problem solving, patient advocacy, evidence-based practice, and continuous learning.[2] In other disciplines, critical thinking may be used in education, psychology, business management, law and ethics, and engineering.[11]
Surrogate terms: Analytical thinking, clinical reasoning, creative thinking, problem-solving skills, reflective thinking. These terms are often used interchangeably.[2]
Defining attributes: Defining attributes are the characteristics that are common to all instances of the concept being analyzed, differentiating it from similar or related concepts.[7] Some frequent attributes for critical thinking in nursing contribute to its complexity and significance.[10]
| Attribute | Description |
| Analysis | The ability to systematically examine information to identify patterns and key components.[14] |
| Evaluation | The capacity to assess the credibility to inform decision-making.[15] |
| Clinical reasoning | The process of synthesizing information to make sound clinical judgments.[14] |
| Problem solving | The skill to identify, define, and address patient care issues or challenges by applying critical thinking strategies.[16] |
| Decision making | The ability to make informed and timely decisions based on critical analysis. |
| Creative thinking | The capacity to generate innovative ideas or solutions to address complex problems in patient care. |
| Open mindedness | The willingness to consider multiple perspectives or alternative solutions without bias. |
Table 1: Attributes of critical thinking
Constructed cases of critical thinking in nursing:
Model case: All critical attributes of a concept can be explained through the model case. Nurse Sadia works in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) where she encounters a 5-year-old patient with respiratory distress. Despite the chaotic environment, Sadia remains calm and assesses the child’s airway, breathing, and circulation. Using critical thinking skills, she quickly identifies signs of impending respiratory failure and collaborates with the medical team to initiate oxygen therapy and prepare for possible intubation.[16]
Borderline case: A borderline case demonstrates few critical characteristics of the concept.[7] Nurse Maria works in a busy medical-surgical unit where she is assigned to care for a patient with diabetes who is presented with hyperglycemia and confusion. Despite receiving education on diabetes management, Maria struggles to apply critical thinking skills in this situation. She finds it challenging to assess the patient’s response to insulin therapy and interpret blood glucose levels accurately. Her ability to think critically is hindered by the complexity of the patient’s condition and the lack of support and resources available in the care environment.
Contrary case: The contrary case has no defining characteristics of the concept.[17] Nurse Farina works in a surgical unit; she encounters a patient who presents with signs of septic shock. Despite the patient’s deteriorating condition, Farina fails to recognize the urgency of the situation and overlooks critical assessment findings. Farina hesitates to escalate care or seek assistance from the healthcare team. The nurse’s lack of critical thinking leads to delays in diagnosis and treatment, ultimately compromising the patient’s safety and well-being.
Determination of antecedents: According to Walker and Avant, these events must be present or happen before the concept. Conversely, the consequences are that the concept might lead to or result in certain events.[16]
Antecedents: Antecedents are necessary conditions that must be met for a concept to exist.[7] Several factors contribute to the development of critical thinking skills in nursing.
Formal education and training, including undergraduate and graduate nursing programs, provide foundational knowledge and skills necessary for critical thinking.[17]
Clinical experience: Exposure to diverse patient populations and challenging clinical scenarios fosters the refinement of critical thinking.
A supportive environment, characterized by organizational culture, leadership support, and interprofessional collaboration, creates opportunities for nurses to further develop their critical thinking.
Individual characteristics: These characteristics (intellectual curiosity, openness to new ideas, and cognitive flexibility) influence critical thinking skills.[10]
Consequences: According to consequences are the outcomes that arise from the concept being analyzed. The consequences of critical thinking are far-reaching and impact various aspects of patient care and nursing practice.[7] Enhanced patient outcomes, including improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, are direct results of nurses’ ability to think critically and provide evidence-based care.[14] Professional satisfaction is a consequence of critical thinking.
Empirical referents: Empirical indicators help to recognize/ measure the defining attributes of the concept. Empirical referents serve as tangible indicators of critical thinking. Patient outcomes can be used to evaluate the impact of critical thinking[14] After an extensive search, one empirical referent tool was found.
Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal (WGCTA): The WGCTA is a widely used assessment tool consisting of multiple-choice questions that assess various aspects of critical thinking ability in nursing students and nurses
Results
The concept analysis showed that critical thinking in nursing is not a single, discrete ability but rather a multifaceted, integrative cognitive process. According to a review of the research, critical thinking consistently includes a set of cognitive and dispositional traits that help nurses understand data, make wise clinical decisions, and deal with challenging patient scenarios. Analysis, evaluation, clinical reasoning, problem solving, decision making, creative thinking, and open-mindedness were among the distinguishing characteristics found in all of the sources. The fundamental procedures by which nurses methodically review patient data and determine the applicability and reliability of the information at hand are analysis and evaluation. Clinical reasoning emerged as a central attribute linking these cognitive processes to nursing actions, allowing for the synthesis of data into meaningful clinical judgments. Problem-solving and decision-making reflected the application of critical thinking to identify patient care issues and select appropriate interventions, while creative thinking supported flexibility and innovation in addressing complex or non-routine clinical challenges. Open-mindedness was identified as an essential disposition that enables nurses to consider alternative perspectives and avoid bias in clinical decision-making.
The development of critical thinking in nursing was discovered to have certain prerequisites. It was recognised that structured training programs and formal education provided the theoretical foundations required for the growth of critical thinking. Clinical work, particularly exposure to a range of challenging patient care scenarios, helped develop and use critical thinking skills. Supportive learning and practice environments with opportunities for introspection, collaboration, and leadership support were also identified as significant antecedents. Individual characteristics, including intellectual curiosity, cognitive flexibility, and a willingness to question assumptions, also have an impact on the growth and expression of critical thinking abilities.
The consequences of critical thinking in nursing were consistently positive. Nurses demonstrating strong critical thinking skills were associated with improved patient outcomes, enhanced patient safety, higher quality of care, and greater patient satisfaction. At the professional level, critical thinking contributed to increased confidence, accountability, and job satisfaction. Empirical referents identified in the literature included both standardized assessment tools and observable clinical outcomes. WGCTA was identified as a commonly used standardized instrument for assessing critical thinking abilities in nursing students and practicing nurses, while patient outcomes and clinical performance indicators were recognized as indirect measures of critical thinking in practice.
Discussion
The conclusions of this concept analysis provide a clarified and thorough understanding of critical thinking in nursing, addressing the continuous ambiguity surrounding its definition and implementation. The recognition of critical thinking as a multifaceted cognitive process aligns with the theoretical and empirical literature currently in publication, which views critical thinking as an active, intentional, and self-regulating process that is crucial to professional nursing practice.[9,12] The distinguishing characteristics found in this analysis strongly correspond with well-known models of clinical judgement, especially Tanner’s model, which highlights interpretation, reasoning, and response as essential elements of nursing decision making.[11] This alignment supports the idea that nurses’ capacity to convert knowledge into safe and efficient patient care is based on critical thinking.
The blend of clinical reasoning, analysis, and evaluation emphasises how crucial critical thinking is to good professional judgement and patient safety. These qualities allow nurses to make thoughtful and proactive decisions in challenging clinical settings, going beyond simple task execution. The inclusion of problem-solving and decision-making further reflects the practical application of critical thinking in nursing, as effective patient care requires nurses to identify problems, evaluate alternatives, and select appropriate interventions based on evidence and clinical context.[2,3] Creative thinking, although less emphasized in traditional nursing education, emerged as an important attribute that supports adaptability and innovation in addressing complex patient needs, consistent with findings in educational and nursing literature.[3,4] Open-mindedness, identified as a key dispositional element, aligns with the view that effective critical thinking requires a willingness to consider alternative perspectives and challenge assumptions.[18]
The antecedents identified in this analysis emphasize the importance of educational preparation and clinical environments in fostering critical thinking skills. Formal nursing education provides the conceptual and theoretical grounding necessary for higher-order cognitive processing, while clinical experience allows nurses to apply and refine critical thinking skills in real-world contexts.[5,6] Supportive learning environments that encourage questioning, reflection, and collaboration have been shown to enhance nurses’ critical thinking abilities and confidence in clinical decision making.[15] The influence of individual characteristics such as intellectual curiosity and cognitive flexibility further supports the notion that critical thinking development is shaped by both personal and contextual factors.[19]
The consequences identified in this analysis reinforce the significance of critical thinking as a core competency in nursing practice. Improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of care, and increased patient safety are consistently associated with higher levels of critical thinking among nurses, highlighting its direct impact on clinical effectiveness.[2,12] Additionally, the association between critical thinking and professional satisfaction underscores its role in empowering nurses, strengthening professional identity, and promoting accountability in practice.[20] The identification of the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal as a key empirical referent is consistent with its widespread use in nursing education and research; however, the complexity of critical thinking suggests that standardized tools should be complemented by practice-based and reflective assessment methods to capture its contextual nature more fully.[17]
Overall, this concept analysis contributes to reducing conceptual ambiguity by clearly delineating the defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences of critical thinking in nursing. Establishing a shared and evidence-based understanding of this concept is essential for aligning nursing curricula, teaching strategies, and assessment methods. Such conceptual clarity can support educational innovation, strengthen clinical practice, and guide future research aimed at enhancing critical thinking and improving the quality of nursing care.
Conclusion
Upon conducting an extensive literature review, the lead researcher concluded that critical thinking is a foundational skill in nursing practice, essential for providing safe, effective, and patient-centered care. Through an analysis of defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents, this concept analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of critical thinking in nursing. Investing in the cultivation of critical thinking abilities not only benefits individual practitioners but also contributes to improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of care, and professional satisfaction.
References
- Gao X, Wang L, Deng J, Wan C, Mu D. The effect of the problem based learning teaching model combined with mind mapping on nursing teaching: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105306. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105306
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - Alfaro-LeFevre R. Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, and Clinical Judgment: A Practical Approach. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2019
Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, and Clinical Judgment: A Practical Approach. - Zubaidah S, Fuad N, Mahanal S, Suarsini E. Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. J Turk Sci Educ. 2017;14:77-91. doi:10.12973/tused.10214a
Google Scholar - Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:030006051989322. doi:10.1177/0300060519893225
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - Bellaera L, Weinstein-Jones Y, Ilie S et al., Critical thinking in practice: the priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills Creat. 2021;41:100856. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
Crossref | Google Scholar - Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 6th ed. Pearson; 2019. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing
- Christensen M, Liang M. Critical care: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2023;10(3):403-413. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.020.
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - American Psychological Association. Critical thinking. In: APA Dictionary of Psychology. 2018.
APA Dictionary of Psychology - Facione NC, Facione PA. Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and clinical judgment. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44(3):129-136. doi:10.1016/s0029-6554(06)80005-9
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - American Nurses Association. What is Nursing?
What is Nursing - Tanner CA. Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(6):204-211. doi:10.3928/01484834-20060601-04
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - Paul RW, Elder L. Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. J Dev Educ. 2006;30(2):34-35.
Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought - Schiller CJ. Teaching concept analysis to graduate nursing students. Nurs Forum. 2018;53(2):248-254. doi:10.1111/nuf.12233
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - Simpson E, Courtney M. Critical thinking in nursing education: literature review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2002;8(2):89-98. doi:10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00340.x
PubMed| Crossref | Google Scholar - Zori S, Nosek LJ, Musil CM. Critical thinking of nurse managers related to staff RNs’ perceptions of the practice environment. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42(3):305-313. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01354.x
PubMed | Google Scholar - Merriam-Webster. Critical thinking. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary.
Critical thinking - Bittencourt GK, Crossetti Mda G. Habilidades de pensamento crítico no processo diagnóstico em enfermagem (Critical thinking skills in the nursing diagnosis process). Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(2):341-347. doi:10.1590/s0080-62342013000200010
PubMed | Crossref | Google Scholar - Watson G, Glaser E. Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Manual. Psychological Corporation; 1980.
Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Manual - McEwen M, Wills EM. Theoretical basis for nursing. 5th edition. Wolters Kluwer Health. 2019.
Theoretical basis for nursing - Halpern DF, Dunn DS. Thought and Knowledge: An introduction to Critical Thinking. 6th edition. eBook. Routledge; 2022.
Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking
Acknowledgments
Not reported
Funding
None
Author Information
Corresponding Author:
Nadira Nasim
Department of Nursing
College of Nursing, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Email: naseem.ijaz8@gmail.com
Co-Author:
Tahseen Raana
Department of Nursing
College of Nursing, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Authors Contribution
NN conceptualized the study, conducted the literature review, and drafted the manuscript. TR contributed to critical revision, conceptual refinement, and final approval of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final version.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable
Conflict of Interest Statement
Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Guarantor
None
DOI
Cite this Article
Nasim N, Raana T. Concept Analysis of Critical Thinking. medtigo J Neurol Psychiatr. 2026;3(1):e3084312. doi:10.63096/medtigo3084312 Crossref

